FORMING OF THE COMMON AREA FOR COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NEUMATIC AND FIVE-LINE STAFF SEMIOGRAPHY: TRANSCRIPTION AND TRANSNOTATION

Authors

  • Ivan Mishchenko

Keywords:

Byzantine music, neumatic semiography, transcription, transnotation.

Abstract

In the consideration of the work’s musical form musicology uses a wide spectrum of the analysis tools focused on the nature of music; and diversity of musical tools. Researches of the structure regularities (quantization, features of musical movement, identity, contrast etc.) make it possible not only to study the form principles but also to make closer true reading of the concrete music work. In the case of ancient neumatic musical notation, in particular Byzantine one, row of difficulties which need solution occurs on the way of analysis. Relational character of melody fixation in Byzantine music unlike the absolute solmization requires complex study of the graphical systems; harmonious and tone thinking; metric; rhythmic and aesthetic features of the Byzantine musical system of eight modes. Materials of different scientific schools give us clear understanding of the ancient ichos essence with all its musical characteristics. During the 20th century basic principles of the transcription of the middle byzantine semeiography and transnotation of the New method on western five-line staff system have been forming. Achievements of methodology are the result of continued search of keys to the reading of interval, rhythmic and dynamic drawings of Byzantine chants.

References

Ганнік К. Проблеми ритміки візантійського піснеспіву // Калофонія. – Ч. 6. – Львів, 2012. – С. 172–188.

Залєський М. Основи візантійської ритміки // Калофонія. – Ч. 6. – Львів, 2012. – С. 133–171.

Мазель Л., Цуккерман В. Анализ музыкальных произведений. – Москва, 1967. – 749 с.

Αλεξάντρου Μ. Εξήγησεις και μεταγραφές της βυζαντινής μουσικής.– Θεσσαλονίκη, 2010. – 154 σ.

Αλεξάντρου Μ. Παλαιογραφία βυζαντινης μουσικής. Συνοπτικοί πίνακές. – Θεσσαλονίκη, 2009–2010. – 56 σ.

Arvanitis I. The Rhythmical and Metrical Structure of the Byzantine Heirmoi and Stichera as a Means to and as a Result of a New Rhythmical Interpretation of the Byzantine Chant // Acta Musicae Byzantinae. – Centrul de Studii Bizantine Iaşi. – Volumul VI. – Decembrie 2003. – P. 14–29.

Αρβανίτης Ι. Ο ρυθμός των εκκλησιαστικών μελών μέσα από τη παλαιογραφική έρευνα και την εξήγηση της παλαιάς σημειογραφίας – Διατριβή: Ιόνιο Πανεπιστήμιο, 2010. – 443 σ.

Raasted J. A Newly Discovered Fragment of a Fourteenth-Century Heirmologion//Studies in eastern chant. – London-New York-Toronto, 1971. – P. 103–111.

Raasted J. Intonation formulas and modal signatures in Byzantine musical manuscripts. –Copenhagen, 1966. – 238 p.

Raasted J. Pulse and pauses in medieval and postmedieval byzantine chant //XVI inter-nationalen byzantinistenkongress. Wien, 4–9.10.1981. – Wien, 1982. – P.63–72.

Strunk O. The tonal system of Byzantine music // The Musical Quarterly. – Vol. 28 (1942). – P. 190–204.

Stathis G. Les “Protographa” de la transcription dans la notation de la nouvelle méthode // Acta Musicae Byzantinae. – Centrul de Studii Bizantine Iaşi. – Vol. 6. – Decembrie 2003.– Р. 10–13.

Στάθης Γ. Οι αναγραμματισμοί και τα μαθήματα της βυζαντινής μελοποιίας. – Αθήνα, 2008. – 354 σ.

Troelsgård Ch. Byzantine neumes. A new introduction to the middle byzantine musical notation. – MMB Subsidia, Vol. ІХ. – Copenhagen, 2011. – 142 p.

Wellesz E. History of Byzantine Music and Hymnography. – Oxford, 1961. – 461 p.

Published

2023-03-01